Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Mon, 06/04/2018 - 10:38
Paper No. 6385 Dated 4-June-2018
By Dr Subhash Kapila
United States strategic embedment in Asian security can only be successfully effective when US policy in 2018 reflects that India and Japan are the pillars of Asian security and therefore a US “Strategic Imperative” and not a policy choice. Implicit in the foregoing is that the United States must extend strategic equitability in its relationships with India and Japan.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Tue, 04/17/2018 - 10:15
Paper No. 6366 Dated 17-Apr-2018
By Dr. S.Chandrasekharan
With the Cease fire process as well as the desired progress in Constitutional reforms going no where, it is but natural, that the Government of Suu Kyi is trying rearrange the priorities and focus more on the economy.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Tue, 03/20/2018 - 05:57
Paper No. 6357 Dated 20-Mar-2018
By Dr Subhash Kapila
China in the 21st Century may have a mighty military machine and a threatening missiles arsenal capable of hitting Continental United States but the Great Wall of China on land and the Great Sea Wall of artificially constructed & fortified islands in South China Sea still have not made China unassailable
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Mon, 10/23/2017 - 06:24
Paper No. 6315 Dated 23-Oct-2017
By Dr Subhash Kapila
Geopolitical imperatives generated by China’s aggressive bid for global dominance in 2017 has prodded the United States to make the game changing offer of transforming the US-India Strategic Partnership into a dynamic predominantly security-centric relationship catering for Indo Pacific security.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Wed, 10/04/2017 - 06:56
Paper No. 6309 Dated 04-Oct-2017
By Dr Subhash Kapila
Post-Dokalam Standoff in which China defused the confrontation as a political expedient to save the BRICS Summit in Beijing in September 2017, the new Chinese flavour of the season advocated by the Chinese Ambassador to India is that China believes that the “Elephant and the Dragon Can Dance Together”—totally inconceivable.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Tue, 09/05/2017 - 07:12
Paper No. 6299 Dated 05-Sept-2017
by Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan
As the Doklam standoff ended last week, observers were left wondering what the legal circumstances of the situation is, including the international legal status of Tibet. Even the large online Wikipedia encyclopedia added a section titled “Tibetan sovereignty debate” which was last edited on August 27th, 2017.[1]
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Sat, 08/19/2017 - 13:45
Paper No. 6294 Dated 19-Aug-2017
By Bhaskar Roy
The incessant vitriolic attacks on India from the Chinese official media, the foreign ministry and the defense ministry on the Doklam issue is becoming tiresome.
Pages
