Nemesis Catches up With
Father of Mass Casualty Terrorism & Mentor of LTTE -
International Terrorism Monitor: Paper No. 369
By B. Raman
At long last, nemesis overtook Imad
Mughniyeh, the head of the covert action division of the
Hezbollah, who was trained by the Iranian intelligence. At
Damascus on February 12, 2008, he died the way he had sent
hundreds of innocent civilians---- Americans, Israelis,
French and many others--- to their cruel deaths---- through
a car bomb.
2. Nobody knows who planted the car
bomb that killed him. The Hezbollah and Iranian sources have
blamed the Israeli intelligence. One will never know, but
whoever killed him has made a major contribution to the
fight against terrorism. No tears need be shed over his
death. There need be no qualms of conscience over the way he
was killed, through the car bomb technique which he himself
had developed in the Lebanon in the early 1980s and used
with devastating effect to kill hundreds of American and
French soldiers stationed in the Lebanon.
3. Since the explosion in the New York
World Trade Centre in February,1993, the world has been
talking of what has come to be known as new or catastrophic
or mass casualty terrorism. Osama bin Laden has been
projected as the father of this new terrorism. He is not.
The real father was the Iranian-trained Imad Mughniyeh.
Many of the new mass-killing and mass-intimidating modus
operandi being used by different terrorist organisations all
over the world--- the car bomb, the suicide bomber, attacks
on mass transportation systems etc--- were born in the head
of Imad Mughniyeh. bin Laden hated the Hezbollah and Imad,
but at the same time admired their ingenuity in devising
ever new techniques of mass casualty terrorism. He copied
their techniques and imparted a greater lethality to them.
4. Bin Laden was not the only one to
emulate this diabolical killer of people in their hundreds.
So did Prabakaran, the head of the Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE). His techniques of the suicide bomber,
the suicide car and the suicide boat were based on a study
of the MO used by Imad. The deaths of hundreds of civilians
in Sri Lanka and of Rajiv Gandhi in India were the outcome
of the ideas and techniques which Prabakaran and the LTTE
learnt by studying the terror strikes carried out by the
Hezbollah under the guidance of Imad.
5. Imad, bin Laden and Prabakaran---
have one thing in common. Their readiness to send hundreds
of misled young people to death as suicide terrorists, while
saving themselves from death. But, death in the form of a
car bomb ultimately caught up with Imad just as it will one
day catch up with bin Laden and Prabakaran.
6. Nemesis strikes not only terrorists,
but also intelligence agencies, which use terrorists for
achieving strategic objectives. That is what Pakistan has
been learning for the last one year and that is what Syria
has been learning. Imad was not the only terrorist leader to
have operated from a sanctuary provided by Syria. So did
Carlos, So did George Habash, who died recently. So did the
leaders of the Red Army Faction of the then West Germany and
Japan. So did many others. Iran was not the only country
with which A. Q. Khan, Pakistan's nuclear scientist, was in
touch. He was in touch with Syria too. In 2003, when the
US-led troops invaded and occupied Iraq, I had reported
about the secret visit of A. Q. Khan to Syria. The alleged
Israeli Air Force strike on a suspected Syrian nuclear
facility last year was meant to convey a message not only to
Syria, but also to Iran. The message was: "If we want to, we
can. Nobody can stop us."
7. The death of Imad would not be the
end of the Hezbollah. Nor would it be the end of jihadi
terrorism of the Iranian or the Pakistani or Al Qaeda brand.
It will be the beginning of a new phase of terrorism -----
particularly directed at Israeli targets all over the world.
Hezbollh is not known to have a presence in India, but that
does not mean it would not try to attack Israeli targets in
India if an opportunity presented itself. Both the Iranian
intelligence and the Hezbollah have cause for anger against
India because of the launching of an Israeli satellite by an
Indian rocket. They may calculate that a terrorist strike
against an Israeli target in Indian Territory would convey
an appropriate message to Israel as well as India.
(The
writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat,
Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director,
Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)