Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Thu, 06/23/2016 - 10:16
Paper No. 6133 Dated 23-June-2016
By Dr. S.Chandrasekharan
Perhaps no where else in the World are the terrorism laws being misused so blatantly as in Maldives for political purposes and that too with the active connivance of the Judiciary.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Tue, 01/19/2016 - 10:35
Paper No. 6061 Dated 19-Jan-2016
By Dr. S. Chandrasekharan
In our last paper on Maldives, I had mentioned how the opposition MDP was tricked into cooperation for constitutional amendments to be passed in the Majlis in return for release of former president Nasheed.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Tue, 01/05/2016 - 09:18
Paper No. 6053 Dated 5-Jan-2016
By Dr. S. Chandrasekharan
The Maldivian Democracy Network said that Maldives is back sliding into repression with the government stifling dissent and restricting constitutional rights. This appears to be a very mild statement! Maldives is going back to medieval era with all powers concentrated in President Yameen.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Mon, 11/16/2015 - 09:27
Paper No. 6033 Dated 16-Nov-2015
By Dr. S. Chandrasekharan.
Events in Maldives are moving at a very fast pace that it is getting difficult for Analysts to keep track of the developments.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Mon, 09/07/2015 - 10:24
Paper No. 6006 Dated 7-Sep-2015
By Dr. S.Chandrasekharan
It was now the turn of the leading opposition party MDP to be duped into yielding to Yameen’s government without getting anything in return though much was promised as a “quid pro quo.”
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Fri, 07/03/2015 - 06:42
Paper No. 5964 Dated 3-July-2015
By Dr. S. Chandrasekharan
It is time President Yameen, in the long term interest of Maldives and its survival as a democratic county releases former President Nasheed unconditionally.
Submitted by asiaadmin2 on Tue, 06/23/2015 - 10:48
Paper No 5958 Dated 23-June-2015
By Dr. S. Chandrasekharan
The Supreme Court of Maldives is said to have made yet another strike at the roots of democracy in Maldives.
Earlier, last year it interfered with the conduct of the General elections and even went to the extent of sacking both the Election Commissioner and his Deputy for not adhering to the sixteen point guide lines issued by them on the conduct of the elections.
Pages
