Renewed
Support for Sri Lankan Tamil Cause in Tamil Nadu
By B. Raman
There have been signs of
renewed support for the cause of the Sri Lankan Tamils
across the political spectrum in Tamil Nadu, except from
the Congress (I), which continues to adopt an ambivalent
attitude. This support has come not only from the
traditional supporters of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE), but also from other parties such as the ruling
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) of M.Karunanidhi and
J.Jayalalitha of the Anna DMK, the main opposition party.
Even the Tamil Nadu branch of the Communist Party of India
(CPI) has come out in support of the Sri Lankan Tamils.
2.Karunanidhi, who is
generally not given to using strong or emotional language,
has given emotional expression to his anguish over what he
perceives as the continuing policy of the Government of
Mahinda Rajapaksa of suppressing the Tamils. He has conveyed
his concerns to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and stressed
upon him the need to take up the matter strongly with
Rajapaksa in order to stress upon him the importance of
finding a political solution to the problems of the Tamils.
He has convened an all-party meeting in Chennai on October
14, 2008, to work out a common political approach to the
Government of India. Jayalalitha has expressed her support to
the right of self-determination of the Sri Lankan Tamils,
but made it clear at the same time that her support to the
Tamil cause should not be misconstrued to mean any change in
her policy of strong opposition to the LTTE as a terrorist
organisation.
3. It would be incorrect to
view this renewed support as dictated by electoral
considerations in view of the elections to the Lok Sabha
which are expected in the next few months. Despite the
increasing concern in Tamil Nadu over what is perceived as
the anti-Tamil policies of the Rajapaksa Government, the Sri
Lankan Tamil issue is unlikely to play any role in
influencing the voters. Economic and internal security
issues are likely to play a predominant role in the
elections .
4. It would be equally
incorrect for the LTTE leadership to view this as indicating
a softening of the hostility to the LTTE after its role in
the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in May,1991. The attitude
towards an LTTE led by Prabhakaran continues to be as
negative as it has always been since 1991. Any
wishful-thinking by Prabhakaran that he and others who were
responsible for the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi are likely
to be rehabilitated in the eyes of vast sections of the
people of Tamil Nadu, who are now hostile to them, will be
belied. All political leaders except some die-hard
supporters of the LTTE, who have taken up the cause of the
Sri Lankan Tamils with the Government of India, have made it
clear that their support is for the cause of the Sri Lankan
Tamils and not for the LTTE headed by Prabhakaran.
5. The LTTE has been
gratified by this renewed support for the Tamil cause and
has been playing it up. However, there is no evidence to
show that either the LTTE or its supporters in Tamil Nadu,
who are in a small minority, had any role in this renewed
support. This support has been triggered off spontaneously
by heightened concerns over the policies of the Rajapaksa
Government and by the statements of some officials serving
under him such as Lt.Gen.Sarath Fonseka, the Chief of the
Sri Lankan Army, Gothbaya Rajapakse, his brother, who is
also the Defence Secretary, and Rohitha Bogollagama, the
Foreign Minister, as well as by sorrow over what is
perceived in Tamil Nadu as the double-faced policy of the
Government of India on the plight of the Sri Lankan Tamils
and over the lack of interest shown by Manmohan Singh in
taking up the issue more vigorously with the Rajapaksa
Government.
6. The continuing use of
indiscriminate air strikes by the Rajapaksa Government
against the Tamil civilian population in order to intimidate
it into stop supporting the LTTE has come in for strong
criticism. The closing of the doors by it for a political
solution reached through talks with the LTTE has added to
the anger in Tamil Nadu against the Rajapaksa Government. As
the Sri Lankan Army presses its offensive to re-capture the
territory still under the control of the LTTE in the
Northern Province, increasingly disturbing statements have
been coming from officials such as Fonseka highlighting the
rights of the Sinhalese majority and playing down the
legitimate rights of the Tamil minority. All these
developments have caused concern in Tamil Nadu that under
the pretext of crushing the LTTE as a terrorist organisation,
the Rajapaksa Government, whose policies are seen as
largely influenced by Sinhalese hawks, is seeking to crush
the Tamils as a community by exploiting the favourable
ground situation and the lack of interest in the
international community in the developments in Sri Lanka.
Very few in Tamil Nadu take seriously the assurances of
Rajapaksa that after neutralising the LTTE as a terrorist
organisation, his Government will initiate political
measures for meeting the legitimate aspirations of the Tamil
people.
7. At the same time, there
has been a perceptible disenchantment in Tamil Nadu over
what is seen as the lack of interest shown by Manmohan Singh
in the problems of the Sri Lankan Tamils. He is being
compared unfavourably with Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi,
who took a keen interest in the problems of the Tamils and
did not hesitate to take up the matter strongly with the
Governments then in power in Colombo. This disenchantment
has turned into shock following reports of two Indian radar
technicians being injured when two planes of the LTTE's air
wing bombed on September 9, 2008, a Sri Lankan military base
in Vavuniya, which has been co-ordinating the military
operations against the LTTE.
8. The Government of India
had repeatedly assured the Government of Tamil Nadu that it
would give only non-lethal military equipment to the Sri
Lankan Armed Forces, which could not be used in offensive
operations against the LTTE. It had justified its supply of
radars to the Sri Lankan Air Force on the ground that these
radars were meant for use to protect strategic targets in
Colombo against LTTE air strikes. There was initial
opposition in Tamil Nadu's political circles to the supply
of even the radars, but ultimately they were reconciled to
it.
9. The information that the
radars supplied by the Government of India were actually
being used in the frontline areas and that two Indian
technicians were helping the SLAF in their maintenance added
to the concerns in Tamil Nadu and created a suspicion that
New Delhi was not telling the truth to the Government of
Tamil Nadu about the extent of the Indian assistance to the
Sri Lankan Armed Forces in their operations against the LTTE.
10. The fact that despite
the entreaties of Karunanidhi, who has been a loyal
supporter of the Manmohan Singh Government, the Prime
Minister did not directly take up the concerns of the
people and the political leaders of Tamil Nadu with the
Rajapaksa Government and that he left it to M.K.Narayanan,
his National Security Adviser, to handle the matter has
further damaged the image of Manmohan Singh in the eyes of
sections of the political class of Tamil Nadu.
11. The revival of support
for the cause of the Sri Lankan Tamils is still largely
confined to the political class. This has not yet found
vigorous articulation among large sections of the public. It
would be unwise to interpret this as indicating that public
support for the Sri Lankan Tamil cause remains limited and
can be managed.
12. Any fresh humanitarian
disaster consequent upon the military offensive in the
Northern Province could create in Tamil Nadu a situation
similar to what had prevailed in the 1980s when Tamil Nadu
became a rear base for supporting the struggle of the Sri
Lankan Tamils against the Sinhalese. If this happens, any
success of the Sri Lankan Army in its current operations to
crush the LTTE might see only the end of one phase of the
Tamil struggle and the beginning of another.
13. It is important for the
Government of India to show a more visible and vigorous
interest in working for ending at least the ruthless air
strikes against the Tamils and for ensuring that the Tamil
cause is not lost sight of. The Sri Lankan Government has
every right to press ahead with its counter-insurgency
operations in order to restore the Government writ in the
areas now under the control of the LTTE, but its use of air
strikes and its perceived indifference to the legitimate
concerns of India and other members of the international
community should not be accepted.
(The writer is Additional
Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical
Studies, Chennai. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)